data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4da61/4da6195992ec5f48f54ceebdd60249aec9a52b2f" alt="Zoom video test"
Despite having a ton of great features and good build quality, the video quality on the Q8 was pretty rough.Īt $399, the Q8 is almost twice the price of the Q2N 4K.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4432/e4432f74a53593708b394945ec219522f66c2bca" alt="zoom video test zoom video test"
I purchased the Zoom Q8 Handy Video Recorder in early 2019, and I felt like I got a little burned by that device.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c10a2/c10a2f5c509f083f255b180892069eae76ea5036" alt="zoom video test zoom video test"
I was a little cautious about this a new offering, though. With a wide angle lens, built-in high quality microphones, and the ability to function both as a standalone video camera and a webcam, the Q2N seems like a steal at around $220. I’ve used a bunch of Zoom products over the years and have always been impressed with the build quality and usability. Recently, I’ve been hearing good things about the new Zoom Q2N 4K. Value shoppers may find the Sigma 16-28mm F2.8 DG DN Contemporary or Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 to be more appealing thanks to their brighter apertures and lower cost, but they skip on-lens controls and aren't optimized for video.Ever since the pandemic hit, I’ve been researching various devices to find affordable gear recommendations for music teachers and students.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e75/43e75901705b2db3b24f5784d01ec658f5d6a08f" alt="zoom video test zoom video test"
So photographers shopping for a wide zoom should definitely consider it-I'd pick it over the older Vario-Tessar T* 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS (which is still on sale for around $1,000), as the FE offers better handling and optics than the aged Zeiss formula. The electronic zoom ring responds much like a mechanical one, and the short range makes it more of a generalist than a video specialist lens, as is the case with the E PZ 18-200mm and other power zooms available for the system. Photographers avoid power zooms because of lag and imprecision when it comes to setting zoom, but both issues are avoided here. The Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G avoids the typical pitfalls that pigeonhole power zoom lenses for video, notably when it comes to the focus action. Autofocus is quick and silent, another plus for video.
ZOOM VIDEO TEST MANUAL
The optics are parfocal, so the focus point stays set in place when the focal length changes, even when the lens is set to manual focus. If your camera has on-body zoom control you can use it to set the focal length as well. It offers quick zoom changes using the ring, or slower response via the side-mounted rocker. Even so, if you're particularly finicky about mechanical lenses, you may disagree.įor video, the 16-35mm handles quite well. Take that as high praise from a photographer who is often left cold by power zoom lenses. When you take its short zoom range into account, in addition to the well-dampened focus ring, it's easy to forget that you're working with electronic zoom control, not mechanical. Power zooms often suffer from sluggish response to changes in focal length, but the FE PZ 16-35mm is snappy to respond. I was pleasantly surprised to see how well the lens did for photo work. I tried the FE PZ 16-35mm with a pair of full-frame Sony cameras, the a7R IV for stills and the vlogging specialist ZV-E1 for video.
ZOOM VIDEO TEST HOW TO
How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.
ZOOM VIDEO TEST PC
How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4da61/4da6195992ec5f48f54ceebdd60249aec9a52b2f" alt="Zoom video test"